Germany is poised to take a huge bite out of the proverbial xxxx sandwitch... ick.
Free loans backed by taxpayers for the lazy folks in the South. (And it won't even work.)
That is a magnanimous and supreme philanthropic effort.
The world admires you and thanks you.
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Sunday, December 18, 2011
Hong Kong (EUR?) Banks
Oh ya... ya.. here they come... oh ya... do... do... ya... try... keep trying... get the ratio up there... more... do...do... keep doing... do not let us all down now...!! ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!
keep trying!!
keep trying!!
Monday Morning in Europe
No one knows. Our guess?
The powers that be (ick) try to raise the EUR/USD but fail; instead, possibly there is collateral damage from the EUR fallout after "expiration day!"
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
The powers that be (ick) try to raise the EUR/USD but fail; instead, possibly there is collateral damage from the EUR fallout after "expiration day!"
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
Thursday, December 15, 2011
New Physics - Should Help Pharma
The Natural Theory of Space Quantum December 2011
Space is not the existing illusion of our senses; instead, space is quantized and defines itself physically per the (Fibonacci ) infinite sequence:
with seed values
The ratios converge:
Where the “golden ratio”
Adding to, subtracting from, retracing within, and all physics regarding space quanta are events within at least one quantum and changing only at quantum borders (boundaries) per the natural sequence.
For example, the “speed of light” c (Einstein ) is limited because the particle (photon) does not truly travel through (Newtonian ) time and continuous space.
In fact, the particle travels through contiguous space quanta, one by one.
In the Newtonian sense of velocity through continuous space, there should be no limit to velocity. In quantum space, the analogy to Newtonian velocity is the spatial travel across quantum boundaries. Each boundary crossing is the “same” event for light and its velocity is bounded by c in the “sense” of a time t.
There is no real time t; instead, the “particles” travel only in space from one quantum to an adjacent quantum.
As the “growth” sequence itself, successive quanta are different in “size” by the factor:
φ = 1.618
The illusion of Newtonian time should cause a quantifiable perception of the speed of light c relative to space quanta:
Accept: c is the perceived absolute electromagnetic velocity and measurement velocity as known today.
Assume: physical reality is a transition from one region to the next region in space.
Then: particles with subatomic sizes on the order of space quantum boundaries may not traverse the boundary in the same way our senses perceive the transition. This serves to gauge the boundaries between spatial regions.
And: very spatially large and/or “distant” entities may be misrepresented by our sensual (time) measurements by the factor 1.618 for each spatial boundary from our innate sense and our measurements.
And: we as humans experience only the sensual approximation of Newtonian and Euclidean continuity.
Physical relevance is solely the traverse across spatial quantum boundaries.
A two dimensional visualization of quantum spatial boundaries is suggested by the Fibonacci spiral .
A Five Dimensional View of the Spiral:
Physically, we cannot achieve 2 from 0 and 1. We can only achieve 1 from 0 and 1. Following, we can achieve 2 from the adjacency of 1 and 1. And so on.
Since we live in three dimensions, we can easily see the two dimensional intersection within the Euclidean spiral, i.e. the linearity of the spiral intersects with a maximum of three adjacent two dimensional regions.
Space itself, as we know it, is three dimensional. If we lived in five dimensions, we could easily see the three dimensional intersection of a two-dimensional “spiral” with “five” regions of three dimensional space per the natural sequence.
We do not live in five dimensions; instead, we live in three.
The natural sequence begins with the seed values 0 and 1. Perhaps we could visualize 3 from 5 and 5 from 8. But we cannot visualize 3 from 4 or 8 from 9. Physical relevance is solely the traverse across adjacent natural boundaries.
Wave Mechanics:
Wave mechanic princples (Schrodinger ) show:
and so the approximation
ΔxΔk ≥ O(1).
One result (ramification) is a temporally related uncertainty in measurements.
Wave mechanics mathematically defines observations (perceptions) differing from Newtonian continuity; however, wave mechanics is a physical discipline that utilizes the concept of time t,
e.g. Δk depends on a perceived time t (and mass m)
The mathematical (Fourier ) representations (transformations) are not physically real in the sense of a time t.
One possible (sensual) estimation in one dimension of spatial boundary size (between adjacent quantum) could be suggested by:
(Width of boundary)2 = Constant x (Time required sensually for continuity)
(In similar mathematical form to E=mc2.)
Using orders of magnitude 10-27 “sec-cm” suggested by wave mechanics and estimating the “speed” of sensory communication in the range 10-3 sec – 10-6 sec, we would then estimate the magnitude:
b ~ 10-16 to 10-18 meters (for example)
Contiguity of space quantum should be mathematically defined beginning with the natural sequence. That is beyond the scope of this letter.
As an Intermediate Summary:
While we can mathematically achieve 2 from 0 and 1, we cannot physically achieve two from nothing and something.
Each space quantum “experiences” only each of its boundaries.
The juxtaposition of space is physical reality. The sense of time serves to approximate
physical laws and works well within the bounds of our senses.
Entropy:
What we call entropy is in fact a “direction” through Fibonacci space that incorporates an increase in “size” throughout the sequence per the “golden” or “natural” ratio φ.
We cannot propel ourselves 10 meters across the Planet Earth’s surface without an “energy” (the units of which are not a real function of “time”) and similarly a subatomic “particle” cannot propel itself across a spatial quantum boundary without energy.
This serves to increase the “energy” in the following quantum by the factor φ and gives rise to the concept of entropy.
Small Particles:
Spatially (relatively) small particles (entities) with enough energy should have no problem traversing the boundary from one quantum to the next as directed by the entropy of space.
Spatially and massively (energetically) small particles may not be able to traverse the boundaries at all.
In that case, such “particles” could be left behind in space and would not entropically move forward. It seems possible such particles could in fact remain “backward” in the entropical sense.
Massive Energy:
For example, a “large energy between” two relatively small “particles” should easily provide a contiguous directional result through the entropic spatial sequence.
Per the natural sequence of space, mass does not bend (warp) space; instead, space is physically real and unalterable directly by mass (matter) and is independent of the sense of time.
Matter is defined by mass and “consumes” and exists in real space, e.g. our sun has a relatively large mass and “uses” a large amount of space as we know it.
The sun follows across all quantum boundaries along with us.
Space Warp:
The bending of space around mass is not physically real in three dimensions; instead, it is a sensation (illusion) from our innate continuous imagination of spatial contiguity.
The alteration (warping) of three dimensional space can take place through (within) five dimensions per the natural sequence, but cannot take place within three or “four” dimensions. The natural sequence is physical, not arithmetical, and five follows directly from three.
Negative entropy:
Negative entropy can only be achieved through five (maybe three) dimensions. Nothing can be achieved through four dimensions.
Space is not the existing illusion of our senses; instead, space is quantized and defines itself physically per the (Fibonacci ) infinite sequence:
with seed values
The ratios converge:
Where the “golden ratio”
Adding to, subtracting from, retracing within, and all physics regarding space quanta are events within at least one quantum and changing only at quantum borders (boundaries) per the natural sequence.
For example, the “speed of light” c (Einstein ) is limited because the particle (photon) does not truly travel through (Newtonian ) time and continuous space.
In fact, the particle travels through contiguous space quanta, one by one.
In the Newtonian sense of velocity through continuous space, there should be no limit to velocity. In quantum space, the analogy to Newtonian velocity is the spatial travel across quantum boundaries. Each boundary crossing is the “same” event for light and its velocity is bounded by c in the “sense” of a time t.
There is no real time t; instead, the “particles” travel only in space from one quantum to an adjacent quantum.
As the “growth” sequence itself, successive quanta are different in “size” by the factor:
φ = 1.618
The illusion of Newtonian time should cause a quantifiable perception of the speed of light c relative to space quanta:
Accept: c is the perceived absolute electromagnetic velocity and measurement velocity as known today.
Assume: physical reality is a transition from one region to the next region in space.
Then: particles with subatomic sizes on the order of space quantum boundaries may not traverse the boundary in the same way our senses perceive the transition. This serves to gauge the boundaries between spatial regions.
And: very spatially large and/or “distant” entities may be misrepresented by our sensual (time) measurements by the factor 1.618 for each spatial boundary from our innate sense and our measurements.
And: we as humans experience only the sensual approximation of Newtonian and Euclidean continuity.
Physical relevance is solely the traverse across spatial quantum boundaries.
A two dimensional visualization of quantum spatial boundaries is suggested by the Fibonacci spiral .
A Five Dimensional View of the Spiral:
Physically, we cannot achieve 2 from 0 and 1. We can only achieve 1 from 0 and 1. Following, we can achieve 2 from the adjacency of 1 and 1. And so on.
Since we live in three dimensions, we can easily see the two dimensional intersection within the Euclidean spiral, i.e. the linearity of the spiral intersects with a maximum of three adjacent two dimensional regions.
Space itself, as we know it, is three dimensional. If we lived in five dimensions, we could easily see the three dimensional intersection of a two-dimensional “spiral” with “five” regions of three dimensional space per the natural sequence.
We do not live in five dimensions; instead, we live in three.
The natural sequence begins with the seed values 0 and 1. Perhaps we could visualize 3 from 5 and 5 from 8. But we cannot visualize 3 from 4 or 8 from 9. Physical relevance is solely the traverse across adjacent natural boundaries.
Wave Mechanics:
Wave mechanic princples (Schrodinger ) show:
and so the approximation
ΔxΔk ≥ O(1).
One result (ramification) is a temporally related uncertainty in measurements.
Wave mechanics mathematically defines observations (perceptions) differing from Newtonian continuity; however, wave mechanics is a physical discipline that utilizes the concept of time t,
e.g. Δk depends on a perceived time t (and mass m)
The mathematical (Fourier ) representations (transformations) are not physically real in the sense of a time t.
One possible (sensual) estimation in one dimension of spatial boundary size (between adjacent quantum) could be suggested by:
(Width of boundary)2 = Constant x (Time required sensually for continuity)
(In similar mathematical form to E=mc2.)
Using orders of magnitude 10-27 “sec-cm” suggested by wave mechanics and estimating the “speed” of sensory communication in the range 10-3 sec – 10-6 sec, we would then estimate the magnitude:
b ~ 10-16 to 10-18 meters (for example)
Contiguity of space quantum should be mathematically defined beginning with the natural sequence. That is beyond the scope of this letter.
As an Intermediate Summary:
While we can mathematically achieve 2 from 0 and 1, we cannot physically achieve two from nothing and something.
Each space quantum “experiences” only each of its boundaries.
The juxtaposition of space is physical reality. The sense of time serves to approximate
physical laws and works well within the bounds of our senses.
Entropy:
What we call entropy is in fact a “direction” through Fibonacci space that incorporates an increase in “size” throughout the sequence per the “golden” or “natural” ratio φ.
We cannot propel ourselves 10 meters across the Planet Earth’s surface without an “energy” (the units of which are not a real function of “time”) and similarly a subatomic “particle” cannot propel itself across a spatial quantum boundary without energy.
This serves to increase the “energy” in the following quantum by the factor φ and gives rise to the concept of entropy.
Small Particles:
Spatially (relatively) small particles (entities) with enough energy should have no problem traversing the boundary from one quantum to the next as directed by the entropy of space.
Spatially and massively (energetically) small particles may not be able to traverse the boundaries at all.
In that case, such “particles” could be left behind in space and would not entropically move forward. It seems possible such particles could in fact remain “backward” in the entropical sense.
Massive Energy:
For example, a “large energy between” two relatively small “particles” should easily provide a contiguous directional result through the entropic spatial sequence.
Per the natural sequence of space, mass does not bend (warp) space; instead, space is physically real and unalterable directly by mass (matter) and is independent of the sense of time.
Matter is defined by mass and “consumes” and exists in real space, e.g. our sun has a relatively large mass and “uses” a large amount of space as we know it.
The sun follows across all quantum boundaries along with us.
Space Warp:
The bending of space around mass is not physically real in three dimensions; instead, it is a sensation (illusion) from our innate continuous imagination of spatial contiguity.
The alteration (warping) of three dimensional space can take place through (within) five dimensions per the natural sequence, but cannot take place within three or “four” dimensions. The natural sequence is physical, not arithmetical, and five follows directly from three.
Negative entropy:
Negative entropy can only be achieved through five (maybe three) dimensions. Nothing can be achieved through four dimensions.
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
EUR/USD Trade - Lack of USD Printing Perceived
Of course, the current outlook for USD PRINTING is slight following no news of anticipated printing from the FOMC minutes and still with only one sole disrespected fellow advocating turning on the printing presses.
BUT that could easily change by January.
The hope and dreams of the insti's now is that they can stay in business until... well... until Jan2011. Probably not though.
BUT that could easily change by January.
The hope and dreams of the insti's now is that they can stay in business until... well... until Jan2011. Probably not though.
Huge EUR/USD Decline
Yes, there have been three days of equity selling to go along with the EUR/USD collapse, but there has not been as much equity selling as we would expect.
In that case:
1. Expect more US equity selling.
2. Realize that if the EUR/USD goes way down and equities only go somewhat down, then the difference is taken up by the purchase-of-puts. That puchase forces the ratio down and can bypass (temporarily) the forced selling of equities.
3. The volume today moved from US equities to Forex. This is weird and keep watching!
4. There are plenty of ways to grow massive wealth through insti mistakes.
In that case:
1. Expect more US equity selling.
2. Realize that if the EUR/USD goes way down and equities only go somewhat down, then the difference is taken up by the purchase-of-puts. That puchase forces the ratio down and can bypass (temporarily) the forced selling of equities.
3. The volume today moved from US equities to Forex. This is weird and keep watching!
4. There are plenty of ways to grow massive wealth through insti mistakes.
TV Advertising to SELL GOLD
The C.N.B.C. ran a long expensive ad today for selling gold.
Except for that, we would recommended to hold for now.
We want to buy on dips.
Someone(s) paid lots of $$ to try to get you to sell gold, i.e. that someone(s) want to BUY.
Be careful with this new confirmation.
The ad is probably somewhat successful so let that take effect.
Then, as we said, buy on dips!
Take confirmations as clear as this one when they come(!)
Except for that, we would recommended to hold for now.
We want to buy on dips.
Someone(s) paid lots of $$ to try to get you to sell gold, i.e. that someone(s) want to BUY.
Be careful with this new confirmation.
The ad is probably somewhat successful so let that take effect.
Then, as we said, buy on dips!
Take confirmations as clear as this one when they come(!)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)