Just more physics for the record - should help PHARMA alot

The Natural Theory of Space Quantum 2011


Abstract:

Physical space is shown to be a contiguous growth. Wave mechanics and Newtonian (through Einstein) mechanics can be united in the absence of a time t.


Introduction:

Space is not the existing illusion of our senses; instead, space is quantized and defines itself physically per the (Fibonacci ) infinite sequence:


with seed values


The ratios converge:





Where the “golden ratio”






Fibonacci Space:

Adding to, subtracting from, retracing within, and all physics regarding space quanta are events within at least one quantum and changing only at quantum borders (boundaries) per the natural sequence.

For example, the “speed of light” c (Einstein ) is limited because the particle (photon) does not truly travel through (Newtonian ) time and continuous space.

In fact, the particle travels through contiguous space quanta, one by one.

In the Newtonian sense of velocity through continuous space, there should be no limit to velocity. In quantum space, the analogy to Newtonian velocity is the spatial travel across quantum boundaries. Each boundary crossing is the “same” event for light and its velocity is bounded by c in the “sense” of a time t.

There is no real time t; instead, the “particles” travel only in space from one quantum to an adjacent quantum.

As the “growth” sequence itself, successive quanta are different in “size” by the factor:

φ = 1.618


The illusion of Newtonian time should cause a quantifiable perception of the speed of light c relative to space quanta:



Accept: c is the perceived absolute electromagnetic velocity and measurement velocity as known today.

Assume: physical reality is a transition from one region to the next region in space.

Then: particles with subatomic sizes on the order of space quantum boundaries may not traverse the boundary in the same way our senses perceive the transition. This serves to gauge the boundaries between spatial regions.

And: very spatially large and/or “distant” entities may be misrepresented by our sensual (time) measurements by the factor 1.618 for each spatial boundary from our innate sense and our measurements.

And: we as humans experience only the sensual approximation of Newtonian and Euclidean continuity.



Physical relevance is solely the traverse across spatial quantum boundaries.


A two dimensional visualization of quantum spatial boundaries is suggested by the Fibonacci spiral .







A Five Dimensional View of the Spiral:

Physically, we cannot achieve 2 from 0 and 1. We can only achieve 1 from 0 and 1. Following, we can achieve 2 from the adjacency of 1 and 1. And so on.

Since we live in three dimensions, we can easily see the two dimensional intersection within the Euclidean spiral, i.e. the linearity of the spiral intersects with a maximum of three adjacent two dimensional regions.

Space itself, as we know it, is three dimensional. If we lived in five dimensions, we could easily see the three dimensional intersection of a two-dimensional “spiral” with “five” regions of three dimensional space per the natural sequence.

We do not live in five dimensions; instead, we live in three.

The natural sequence begins with the seed values 0 and 1. Perhaps we could visualize 3 from 5 and 5 from 8. But we cannot visualize 3 from 4 or 8 from 9. Physical relevance is solely the traverse across adjacent natural boundaries.

Wave Mechanics:

Wave mechanic princples (Schrodinger ) show:



and so the approximation

ΔxΔk ≥ O(1).

One result (ramification) is a temporally related uncertainty in measurements.

Wave mechanics mathematically defines observations (perceptions) differing from Newtonian continuity; however, wave mechanics is a physical discipline that utilizes the concept of time t,

e.g. Δk depends on a perceived time t (and mass m)

The mathematical (Fourier ) representations (transformations) are not physically real in the sense of a time t.

Boundary Size:

One possible (sensual) estimation in one dimension of spatial boundary size (between adjacent quantum) could be suggested by:


(Width of boundary)2 = Constant x (Time required sensually for continuity)

(In similar mathematical form to E=mc2.)

Using orders of magnitude 10-27 “sec-cm” suggested by wave mechanics and estimating the “speed” of sensory communication in the range 10-3 sec – 10-6 sec, we would then estimate the magnitude:

b ~ 10-16 to 10-18 meters (for example)


Contiguity of space quantum should be mathematically defined beginning with the natural sequence. That is beyond the scope of this letter.


Intermediate Review:


While we can mathematically achieve 2 from 0 and 1, we cannot physically achieve two from nothing and something.

Each space quantum “experiences” only each of its boundaries.

The juxtaposition of space is physical reality. The sense of time serves to approximate
physical laws and works well within the bounds of our senses.




Indications:

Entropy:


What we call entropy is in fact a “direction” through Fibonacci space that incorporates an increase in “size” throughout the sequence per the “golden” or “natural” ratio φ.

We cannot propel ourselves 10 meters across the Planet Earth’s surface without an “energy” (the units of which are not a real function of “time”) and similarly a subatomic “particle” cannot propel itself across a spatial quantum boundary without energy.

This serves to increase the “energy” in the following quantum by the factor φ and gives rise to the concept of entropy.


Small Particles:


Spatially (relatively) small particles (entities) with enough energy should have no problem traversing the boundary from one quantum to the next as directed by the entropy of space.

Spatially and massively (energetically) small particles may not be able to traverse the boundaries at all.

In that case, such “particles” could be left behind in space and would not entropically move forward. It seems possible such particles could in fact remain “backward” in the entropical sense.


Massive Energy:

For example, a “large energy between” two relatively small “particles” should easily provide a contiguous directional result through the entropic spatial sequence.

Per the natural sequence of space, mass does not bend (warp) space; instead, space is physically real and unalterable directly by mass (matter) and is independent of the sense of time.

Matter is defined by mass and “consumes” and exists in real space, e.g. our sun has a relatively large mass and “uses” a large amount of space as we know it.

The sun follows across all quantum boundaries along with us.


Space Warp:

The bending of space around mass is not physically real in three dimensions; instead, it is a sensation (illusion) from our innate continuous imagination of spatial contiguity.

The alteration (warping) of three dimensional space can take place through (within) five dimensions per the natural sequence, but cannot take place within three or “four” dimensions. The natural sequence is physical, not arithmetical, and five follows directly from three.


Negative entropy:

Negative entropy can only be achieved through five (maybe three) dimensions. Nothing can be achieved through four dimensions.

Intermediate Summary:

Time is not physically real. It is a neurological simulation of continuity from a real spatially contiguous universe.

There is energy and space. There is no time t.

The idea of a physical time t would mean that “time is continuous, directional, has no real dimension except as previously indicated by a clock, was created somehow unknown to anyone, but still has a real physical significance.” This writing holds that view to be unreconcilable.


An Eight Dimensional View:


In Fibonacci space, our 3-dimensional experience intersects with eight separate five dimensional regions at each boundary.

The boundaries are supposed to be relatively small in a spatial (and energetical) sense.

In the entropical sense, an energy compatible with a boundary region could exist “within” a boundary neither moving forward or backward.

In that case, it seems the specific energy may experience one, several, or all of the intersections.

At such an event, the energy (particle) could traverse among three-dimensional regions of our (experiential) Fibonacci space.

Indications:


Least Energetic Level:

In our experience, everything “falls” to the lowest energy state.

An example would be water flowing through a drain from a sink into a pipe through another pipe and into an urban main drain system leading into a waste water retreatment plant.

The water obeys our perceived law of gravity and falls through pipes “heading” and “directionalized” toward the center of the Earth where the water would experience no other energy realtively speaking. If the water could in fact reach Earth’s center of gravity, it would have fallen into a weightless environment as if the water were in orbit and falling “off” the edge of the Earth.

Similarly, chemical states react into the lowest binding energy form until some larger applied energy can change the state.


Lowest Entropic Level:

The lowest entropical level should be “backward” along the path to higher entropy, i.e. a change of direction toward lower entropy.

In the absence of forward entropical (motion) direction, it seems a particle (entity, maybe having a mass) may seek a lower (backward) entropical state, e.g. a particle within a spatial boundary may be able to traverse various boundaries and may “gravitate” downward in the energetical sense in a similar way to the experience in our three dimensional world.


The Square Law Relationship:

The Einstein2 square law relationship E=mc2 is also dealt with in the Schrodinger6 equation and also in many perceived natural forces like sound and gravity.

The Schrodinger equation needs to include “i”, i.e. the square root of negative one.

Similarly, the natural sequence could proceed in a “negative” direction with the seed values 0 and -1 with physical reality being a “square” and with all ratios matching the positive sequence.

But mathematics is a measurement result of physics, not the other way around.


Negative Entropy:

Negative entropy could be mathematically resolved by an “inverse or reverse” sequence, but physically real negative entropy should only be three-dimensionally achieved through the spatial via-ways resulting from intersecting spatial and energetical boundaries.


Conclusion:

Space is not subject to our views of arithmetic; instead, space is defined by the natural sequence. Contrary to our sensations, time is not physically real. Time is a good measurement approximation in our macroscopic physical world and “historically” is built into all units of energy, measures, and our perceptions.

Space and energy directionally build the concept of entropy.

The dimensionality following from Fibonacci space also implies boundaries. The boundary dimensions are suggested by quantum (wave) mechanics.

Negative entropy should be achieved by exacting the correct energy. Not the most or least energy; instead, the correct energy corresponding to the spatial boundary.



References:

ECB Decision - 2011

We conducted a short experiment in a local establishment in the holiday spirits.

We put money under a shell at the bar. Then we put 4 additional "empty" shells in the same proximity and mixed them all around.

Then we asked people to find the money. If they found it, they could keep it.

Guess what happened?!

Exactly 80% of folks didn't get the money and exactly 20% did!!!

We are going to do the math on this and report back to the ECB.